A7rii vs a7iii reddit. You will have better image stabilisation on the a7iii.

A7rii vs a7iii reddit. Using chatGPT to gather information I think I am pretty much set on trying to get an A7rii but I would like to maybe hear some opinions before I decide. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. Bigger lenses feel a lot more at home on the iii. The EVF in the a7riii is better than a7rii. 8 and the 24-70mm f2. I have an a6300 and, if Sony doesn't announce an a7iii by January, I am going to get an a7rii. On the other hand if buying Sony A7III won't burn a hole in your pocket, than it's a worthy upgrade for 700ish dollars imo! The A7iii is only 8 bit, shoots 4K at up to 30 fps, and has 4:2:0 sampling. If you're just starting out with basic paid projects and on a tight budget, like simple music videos and event videos, yeah I'd roll with the A7iii for now, especially if you plan to snap some photos as well. I use the a7iii and the af / eye af is excellent but I also use a 5ds so the extra mega pictures allows for more cropping and details so I can see the benefit of the a7riii. 85mm has always been my favorite focal length and I think you could definitely use it alongside a 24-70 zoom. As for the MP, 42 vs 33, i would give up 9 megapixels for an overall better body, new menu system, autofocus, etc. The battery life on the A7RIII is far better than on the A7RII. Just glancing at amazon used right now, looks like A7iii is at a huge pricing advantage vs a7iv or a7siii. If you’re not doing extremely high-level stuff, A7iii is completely fine even for pro work, don’t get tripped out by the numbers. However, the battery life in mark ii's are pretty bad, and the a7iii would be more future proof if I decide to get some modern AF lenses. I love my a7iii and haven't regretted getting it one bit. 4 GM (a combo I own and love) will set you back $3400 and weigh 1100g, while the XT3 and 16mm 1. 1. If it was the other way around, I'd be keeping the a6300 because of 1080p @ 120fps. You will have better image stabilisation on the a7iii. . The A7III is generally a nicer experience to use due to the better AF, improved weather sealing, bigger grip and far better battery. Feb 27, 2018 · Update: our A7 III vs A7R III full comparison is now online! If the specifications are anything to go by, the A7 III definitely feels like a more balanced solution than the A7R III. Yet the form factor hasn’t changed much; both bodies are relatively compact and lightweight, clocking in at 625 g (for the Sony a7R II) and 650 g (for the Sony a7 III). As a result, they perform about a stop better in low-light conditions. It's a really great all rounder. I have read that the a7rii does have eye AF-C but it's supposed to be not as reliable or quick as third generation bodies (a7iii). Hello guys, I currently have an A7rii and am looking to upgrade since I can't stand the absence of a joystick and the bad battery life. 8. Perhaps the g-series lens on the r, but I like the images and videos more. I probably will get a a7rii next year because only because I have 10 FpW50 batteries and the a7riii is too much money. A7RII only beats it out on Megapixels. For high megapixel you have the R series, but how much cropping you will be doing? I'm also doing some cropping and 24 mp is more than people are thinking, printed my photos 70x50 cm. Your gimbals performance will probably be better then one for I have found two options that are on sale right now, an A7iii with the 28-70mm f/3. Between A7c & A7iii, the a7iii because it has viewfinder. Get the A7III, no other reason that it uses a significantly better battery (NPFZ100) The A7SII and A7RII both use the NP-FW50 which is the worst. 8 primes, A7III pairs better with heavier lenses Better battery life. If you’re trying to shoot handheld (high ISO’s) then the A7RII and A7III will perform at least a stop better tide to their backlight illuminated sensor with the A7III in particular performing strongly. The A9 is far superior to the A7III for weddings and if you’re getting paid to shoot them then absolutely jump on that. Some thoughts: Identical sensor. It is more expensive obviously, and so are the lenses. It combines high quality stills and video with the most recent autofocus system, all in a very affordable package. EVF bigger on the A7iii, but the flippy screen in the A7c is more useful. More buttons on the A7iii, although IMHO one doesn't need them as much on the A7c. The A7RII, A7III and above all have a more modern dual conversion gain sensor. This is a community to share and discuss 3D photogrammetry modeling. 8, Zeiss 35mm f2. I think even those prices are good for the bodies by themselves. I found two used cameras with low shutter counts online to buy and found an A7Rii with kit lens for $550 and an a7iii for $750 and I'm stumped on which to buy or is better. Currently using the a7R3, it's a great camera overall but does fall behind when it comes to focus. At the launch event Sony called the a7 III their "basic" full frame model, but it's definitely anything but basic. Size & Weight. 5-5. 8 Samyang 75mm f1. The A6400 would make an excellent backup camera should you go A7III. Admittedly it’s getting a bit old, it’s probably superior to the EOS-R in almost every category. Better in low light vs Fuji A7rii has the worst battery but 42mp! Better in low light vs the Fuji I was facing a similar decision earlier this year. I guess the answer depends on your requirements, if you shoot landscape, astro and portrait, get a7R3; if you shoot animals and sport, then a7C should serve you better. If i was buying a new body, I would only consider getting A7III for the price (1800), and maybe get a GM lens to go with it. If huge prints/billboarders arent a concern i would say get the A7III. If you're only doing landscapes, portraits and food photography. My time with the A7rii was mostly with the 55mm f1. Posted by u/v1rion - 8 votes and 12 comments I have the a7rii, and debating on whether it's an upgrade and would it be worth it to go the a7iii? OR, for the price difference of upgrading I could… Kinda clueless on in body vs lens AF I think even if I spent more for the a7iii (would still have to be a great price), I could still get the 35mm 1. I was able to get the A7Rii down to $825 compared to the A7iii for $925 but I think I might still go with the A7iii. Dynamic range makes a huge difference when it comes to quality. My main lens is the Tamron 28-70 f/2. Im looking to buy either an A7iii or an A7Rii as my first sony camera. You’ll have lighter and cheaper lenses - for example, the A7III and 24mm 1. Upgrading from a7rii to a7riii was huge! And since getting the a7riii, I picked up: Samyang 24mm f1. Differences aside, the A7iii provides amazing quality at a great price, and is still sufficient for most professional shoots. I am a newbie to photography and would be mostly using the camera for landscape and architectural photography. The A7iii has one of the best sensors Sony has ever made, is better in low light, and produces much smaller files. g. Whether you're a seasoned professional or just starting out, this subreddit is the perfect place to ask questions, seek advice, and engage in discussions about all things photography. 8 zoom lens, and possibly an 85mm prime. I would push you towards the A7rii. I'm an amateur photographer and bought these three cameras a7iii, a7rii, & a6300 purely for photography. Cheap but not free. The reason I keep my A7RII is it is the last of the Sony FF cameras that can use the downloadable Play Memories apps. Plus using my Loawa 15mm has become a lot easier because of the touch screen. ) the a7rii is better if you post process, the a7iii is better straight out of camera 2. Works better with gimbals due to being lighter IMHO if it's just for stills and all you care about is ergonomics then stick to A7III, it suits you better. 4 Samyang 135mm f1. Hello guys, I want to get into cameras as I’m a beginner: -a7rii with 33k shots and 50mm f1. After doing some quick comparisons, A7iii is on par if not better than A7Riii in almost every aspect Sharing some of my findings here: Where A7iii > A7Riii : Better focus system (693 phase detection with 93% coverage vs 399 phase detection with 68% coverage) Between the A7III and the Xt3, unless you need the absolute best low light capability, APSC is plenty of sensor. Avchd, etc. 8 or -a7iii with 440k shots and kit lens I honestly don’t know exactly what to go for and I’d appreciate help. 4, past that the lenses are all double or triple the One of the biggest things for me coming from the A7rii to the A7riii was the touch screen. ) the a7iii has better battery, but the a7rii comes with two batteries and a charger 3. I'd say if I got the A7Rii I could afford a more expensive lens but the consensus seems to be that the Sony 1. However, I've recently started taking more video and wondering about the strength and weaknesses for 4k on these cameras. If you choose A7iii you can use sony film simulation with the picture profiles. The A7III is pretty much a A7RIII with less megapixels and and lower res EVF. The a7R II and the a7 III are full frame Sony bodies separated by several years of upgrades. But, Sony A7II is better bang for buck if your only priority is solely Image Quality. I picked up a used A7RII a few month ago and just sold it and bought a A7RIII a couple weeks ago. For family stuff I would even push you to the A7iii. A mid-range model like the previous A7 II, it borrows a number of features from the two current flagships, the A9 and A7r III, making it the perfect full-frame solution for photographers on a restricted budget. I went ultimately went with the a7iii. mp4, and the a7iii video files tend to be more confusing to me. I’m not a fan of Sony cameras for a variety of reasons, but I do know quite a bit about them. I do some video, but my main focus is photo. Here are some reasons why your a7iii will perform better. Thinking it will be more future proof and fit my photos better. The A7III has a better autofocus system, improved ergonomics, and some other advantages. As for glass. I think the biggest reason to use a7iii over Ur phone will be the dynamic range you will get from slog. com Jul 20, 2018 · In this comparison article I'm going to take a closer look at the 12 key differences between the Sony a7III and the a7RIII. Switching over from nikon and mainly gonna be shooting night clubs, parties (21st birthday parties) and possibly some weddings and concerts/festivals. Because most of the time people aren’t looking at billboards/prints and pixel hunting. I think 440k may be too many shots even if the camera is in good condition. 8 Needless to say, but the lens options available for the fe is incredible. I know that a7III has better AF, battery and memory card slots. Given my price point on the used market, I seem to be in the range of an A7III or an A7rii. Mar 1, 2018 · Sony has announced the second camera in its third-generation A7 series, the Sony A7 III. I use spot AF often and moving that was a lot easier. When I use my A7RII, I make a point to carry several charged backup batteries which are fortunately quite inexpensive. At the moment the A7ii and other old models are too expensive due to the chip shortage, same as the A7iii. The A7R3 is a great camera. The small size and compatibility with your Sony FF glass means that the space cost of the backup is very small. I feel that I can use the 20% saved on a better lens though. I know the resolution is a big plus, but what else does it add to the experience? Better AF, ISO performance? Or is just a marginal upgrade and I should wait and upgrade to A7iii/Riii? Thanks both are great choices a7iii has the edge on af but you do landscapes so a7riii will give you more detail and the ability to crop more. I own an a7iii, and use an a7Rii at work. If 24mp is enough for your needs than the improvements on the A7III will making shooting a lot more enjoyable. Don't get me wrong, the a6400/a6500 is more than enough to get you started and to start making money. 8 Samyang 45mm f1. I use the A7iii. So if you decide to go with a7rii for eye AF to capture moving subjects, temper your expectations for in focus shots. Blackout free shooting, superior AF tracking and silent 20 FPS are just immensely valuable tools that make the A9 stand out from ‘entry-level’ full frame bodies. 6 kit lens for 1650 euros and the a6500 with the 16-70mm f/4 kitlens for 1799 euros. I am having a tough time deciding between a7rII and a7III, as I am getting a 20% discount on a7rII. Dec 3, 2023 · 1. Plus the AF joystick for both manual lense like the loawa or even my 24-70mm GM really helps out with spot AF. I found a A7RII for under $600 and thinking I should go for it, but I know a lot recommend the A7III. I don't do much videography and mainly shoot a wide variety of categories. So the A7III and A7RIII are the same price in my country and can't decide, I don't really find the 42mp that much intresting since I do a lot of video and some photo, which one would recommend if you were in my place? Sony A7Rii vs A7iii vs 6400 Trying to decide on what camera to purchase, i just do it as a hobby for now and 99% of the photos i take an automotive/car related, and mostly just pictures no video yet but eventually would like to get into video too and i believe the A7Rii is my best option but would also like to hear opinions If you absolutely need, Eye Autofocus, Usb-C Charging, Better Higher ISO performance and a Stellar Battery Life go for Sony A7III. Going through Sony’s cameras, I have found two like the A7 models the most. AF in the A7c is uncanny and feels like cheating at times, although the A7iii's no slouch either. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I bought it a few months ago despite 'A7iv being around the corner' because the A7iii is a well-established, proven camera and it was on sale :-) I'll move up to the A7IV at some point in the future well after it has been out and the price comes down to earth, and maybe its had a few firmware updates. I did own the A7rii and moved to the A7riii. A7ii for sure, but anyway, I'd keep waiting. I'm actually getting an original A7s as my second camera, because 12 megapixels is enough, it's small (no IBIS), and reportedly is a great match for vintage lenses, which is all I use these days. Another note about the processor - because it is completely new, Sony will likely support it with firmware updates later and any new features they come up with will have a better chance of making into the a7IV than the a7RIV. However in my personal opinion, I think getting the a7iii would be best (I say that only because it worked out for me). 8 Sigma 85mm f1. Low light, autofocus, battery, video capabilities,controls(joystick) are better on the A7III. I'd also suggest getting the Sigma 24-70 f2. There are a few other improvements in the A7R II; faster continuous burst speeds, electronic shutter mode, etc. You could easily get the job done, and save money with getting the a7iii, but if you're wanting to future-proof yourself then definitely go with the a7iv. Setup feels balanced with lighter lenses like 35/50/85 1. Of the three am I correct that 4k quality would go a7iii > a7rii > a6300 ? More resolution personally isn't a draw for me, 24 MP of the a7iii is fine and the 33 MP of a7IV will be even better. I don’t care for the way the Sony fits in the hand, I don’t care for their menu system, and I For most cases I would recommend the a7iii. 8 is better than the Sigma 1. 8 . 4 WR costs $2300 and weighs 1000g. As AF speed will not matter in those types of photography. It is more dependable on the A7riii. See full list on mirrorlesscomparison. (Another option would be a sony a7RII for 1499euro for the body only) What I would like to know is if you would suggest any of these cameras as a good option. articles on new photogrammetry software or techniques. I like the higher resolution on the A7Rii but I hear the A7iii has much upgraded sensor along with features like stabilization. The benefits of the improved AF in a7iii would be wasted at the moment, and the used A7ii/Rii would be about 50% cheaper than the a7iii new. Plus the r can record to . As flash is often not allowed so having better iso performance in my book is better. ) the a7iii has better video. 8 Samyang 35mm f1. You could even use it as a B-camera with some of the smaller FF lenses available, for when your A7III is on a tripod, and you want to capture a fast moment. Hey guys, can you tell me if it’s worth the switch from th le A7ii to A7Rii? Mainly for stills, portait, some events and product shots. Ideally you should be upgrading to the A7iii, which is quite a lot better than the A7ii. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. Above but A7iii instead of A7Rii - approx £3,600-£3,850 Pros: image quality, thinner DoF, ‘cropability’ Cons: massive file sizes won’t be good on my 2012 MacBook, more expensive lenses, added weight vs APS-C setup, less ‘reach’ Related Photography (Reddit) Meta/Reddit forward back r/AskPhotography Whether you're a seasoned professional or just starting out, this subreddit is the perfect place to ask questions, seek advice, and engage in discussions about all things photography. They’re all pretty good cameras but you need half as many batteries with the A7III to get through a day shooting. Links to different 3D models, images, articles, and videos related to 3D photogrammetry are highly encouraged, e. 8 GM. Yep for sure not just for the bundle items. Your gimbals performance will probably be better then one for Yep for sure not just for the bundle items. vuuvvqv pjrcwxck lbzw hbdvo mwaqka yyijz zmo fibmll fgew ybhdsvg